">
Death of Nancy Benoit rumour posted on Wikipedia hours prior to body being found
June 5th, 2021 | Uncategorized |
Thursday, June 28, 2007
| This article mentions the Wikimedia Foundation, one of its projects, or people related to it. Wikinews is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Wikinews has learned through an investigation that anonymous edits on the Wikipedia article Chris Benoit were added about the death of his wife Nancy Benoit 14 hours before police entered the Benoit home to find the former professional World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) Canadian wrestler and his family dead.
An anonymous edit from IP address 69.120.111.23 using the Internet service provider Optimum Online was made at 04:01 UTC on Chris Benoit’s Wikipedia article. On a paragraph about an earlier fight: “However, Chris Benoit was replaced… due to personal issues,…”, the anonymous editor added ” stemming from the death of his wife Nancy.” The edit was reversed just under one hour later with the comment: “Need a reliable source. Saying that his wife died is a pretty big statement, you need to back it up with something.”
Then just one hour later after the first edit reversion, another anonymous edit by 125.63.148.173 using unwiredAustralia.com.au, a wireless Internet service provider, was made adding about the aforementioned personal issues: “which according to several pro wrestling websites is attributed to the passing of Benoit’s wife, Nancy.” That edit was reverted just under 20 minutes later, with the comment: “Saying ‘several pro wrestling websites’ is still not reliable information.”
Further investigation shows that the IP address used to make the first edit is located in Connecticut, but the IP address is not linked to any computers or servers used by the WWE, but according to Cary Bass, Volunteer Coordinator for the Wikimedia Foundation, the IP address matches a location in Stamford, Connecticut where the WWE headquarters is located. Bass also informed the local authorities in Atlanta about the unusual edits, but it is not known if the edits were investigated by the police. The second edit was made by a computer in Australia from a wireless network.
“It didn’t become apparent until someone put the pieces together and realized that the comment was made by someone who apparently knew about the murders,” added Bass.
Fayette County Sheriff deputy Lt. Tommy Pope stated that police found the family at about 2:30 p.m. ET, which is 18:30 UTC, on Monday when the WWE called police and asked them to do a “welfare check” after employees of WWE received calls and text messages from Chris Benoit. Early Sunday, Benoit sent repeated text messages that read “My physical address is 130 Green Meadow Lane, Fayetteville Georgia. 30215.” Another text message reportedly said “The dogs are in the enclosed pool area. Garage side door is open.” The messages were sent around 4:00 a.m. ET.
Earlier, on Saturday afternoon, Chris Benoit placed a series of calls that explained why he missed his flight to Houston. The stories he told were mostly about his wife and son being sick with food poisoning and vomiting. Although, in one call he said that he and Nancy were at the hospital to be with Daniel who was hospitalized. Throughout he insisted that he would attend that live event in Houston.
When he missed the live event on Sunday, and the WWE couldn’t get hold of him, they contacted authorities. Police say that Benoit strangled his wife on Friday, smothered his son on late Friday or early Saturday, and then hanged himself inside his weight room on Sunday or Monday.
The Wikinews investigation is unable to conclude whether the anonymous editors had inside information about the death of Nancy Benoit.
This is not the first time Benoit’s article has been edited to show false or unsourced information, as the article’s edit history indicates a long history of promotional spam and vandalism. Around the time of the edits, the article contained a hidden warning to editors of the section mentioned, warning against adding rumours and speculations. For the time being, Benoit’s article has been protected in an attempt to stop the addition of fraudulent information.
No Comments
Saturday, June 5, 2010
The 1,200-ton MV Rachel Corrie, an Irish aid ship, was seized by the Israeli Naval Forces, as it attempted to challenge the blockade of Gaza. It was seized in international waters, about 20 miles (30 kilometers) from Gaza’s shore.
The military said its forces boarded ship from the sea, not helicopters and didn’t meet any resistance. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign said: “No contact has yet been made with the kidnapped passengers but we have learned that they have been taken to Holon detention centre where they could be deported as early as tonight.”
Passengers include Irishman Dennis Halliday, a former assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Northern Irish Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Corrigan Maguire, and a group of Irish and Malaysian pro-Palestinian activists.
The ship, named in honor of American peace activist Rachel Corrie, contains support including: toys, school supplies, wheelchairs, medical equipment and cement, a material that Israel has restricted from entry into Gaza. The crew had rejected an offer to unload its cargo in Israel and accompany it across the border.
The Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign initially organised the ship. Jenny Graham, a Free Gaza Movement (FGM) activist, assured that everything aboard the ship had been inspected in Ireland. A FGM activist Greta Berlin, based in Cyprus, said: “We are an initiative to break Israel’s blockade of 1.5 million people in Gaza. Our mission has not changed and this is not going to be the last flotilla.”
This comes after the death of nine activists when Israeli commandos raided the ‘Gaza Freedom Flotilla’ that planned to breach the Gaza blockade.
Submitted by: Sheila Challiner
Critical Illness Cover (CIC) pays you the lump sum insured, which is tax-free, if you are diagnosed with a life-threatening illness which renders you incapable of working.
People are living longer with conditions which might have been a death sentence a decade ago, thanks to advances in medicine and treatment.
Insurers are finding that while life assurance claims are dropping, they are having to honour more and more claims on CIC policies. The result of this is that the cost of CIC is becoming a lot more expensive than life cover. If the number of CIC claims fall then inevitably the cost of premiums will fall too.
The cost of Swiss Life and Legal & General s CIC has risen by around 20 and 25 per cent respectively. But the likes of Norwich Union and Scottish Equitable far outstrip them in the price rise race with increases of up to 60 per cent. Other providers are looking to charge more for CIC as well as the market speculates over the definition of life-threatening illness and medical science makes giant strides in the management and control of certain conditions.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH7KZD5vGBY[/youtube]
The Association of British Insurers has looked at cover for prostate cancer and heart problems, for example. If these illnesses are discovered early on they are no longer deemed to be life-threatening , at least for some sufferers. Another example is diabetes. Currently BUPA is the only insurance provider which still allows this condition on its list of critical illnesses covered.
Kevin Carr at broker LifeSearch explains, “Although this type of insurance was originally known as ‘dread disease’, many of the conditions currently covered by critical illness policies are becoming quicker and easier to detect and treat. Hence insurers have recently found themselves paying out on claims where the condition was not life threatening, which isn’t the purpose of the policy.”
A CIC policy usually runs for an agreed term, for example tied in with the length of time on a mortgage, and there is no change in the premiums. The premiums are expensive for this cover. Insurers are now looking to offer reviewable policies where both the illnesses covered and the premiums paid are revisited every five years, which should cost a good bit less.
Rye Mills, group director of the independent financial adviser division of Liverpool Victoria, reckons that more people will choose the reviewable policies as they become considerably cheaper than the guaranteed cover.
As he says, “At the end of the day there’s a price to be paid for the peace of mind a guaranteed policy gives.”
Legal & General still offers a guaranteed CIC but has put its premiums up for that. It has launched a reviewable policy as an alternative. Scottish Widows and Skandia no longer provide guaranteed CICs.
Ronnie Martin, protection director at Legal & General, explains, “The reviewable price will be typically [around] 15 per cent lower than the guaranteed cover.”
An existing guaranteed CIC policy cannot be altered to redefine any illnesses which are currently classed as life-threatening but which may not be in that category in the future. So if you have one of these already and are happy to pay the premiums you don t have to worry.
If you are planning to take out a CIC policy expect to pay less for a reviewable policy. But if you want the extra peace of mind a guaranteed policy offers, get it quickly while there are still some around, and remember you ll have to pay the extra price.
About the Author: Interested in getting a quote on
Life insurance
? Please Visit the Life Insurance underwriters for more information and other resources. Our sister site Brokers Online offers cutting edge articles and information about
Life Insurance
and other financial products.
Source:
isnare.com
Permanent Link:
isnare.com/?aid=353311&ca=Finances